<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credit Card Borrowing Falls by Record Amount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lendingclub.com/2009/05/13/credit-card-borrowing-falls-by-record-amount/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lendingclub.com/2009/05/13/credit-card-borrowing-falls-by-record-amount/</link>
	<description>The Official Lending Club blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="Blog 8.1" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cuthbert</title>
		<link>http://blog.lendingclub.com/2009/05/13/credit-card-borrowing-falls-by-record-amount/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cuthbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lendingclub.com/?p=1120#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>Another factor might be lowered credit limits. This week, I
received a letter from BofA that they&#039;re lowering the credit limit
on my card from $50,000 to $25,000 -- in other words, from
astronomically outrageous to ridiculous. Considering that I only
use it for online purchases (as a safety buffer -- should the
number get compromised, anything over $50 is their responsibility,
not mine), pay it off every month, and have never used more than
$5,000, I couldn&#039;t care less. But for someone who&#039;s stretched to
the limit, I can see how this would alter behavior drastically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factor might be lowered credit limits. This week, I<br />
received a letter from BofA that they're lowering the credit limit<br />
on my card from $50,000 to $25,000 -- in other words, from<br />
astronomically outrageous to ridiculous. Considering that I only<br />
use it for online purchases (as a safety buffer -- should the<br />
number get compromised, anything over $50 is their responsibility,<br />
not mine), pay it off every month, and have never used more than<br />
$5,000, I couldn't care less. But for someone who's stretched to<br />
the limit, I can see how this would alter behavior drastically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

