<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lending Club Welcomes Zopa Person-to-Person Lending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/lending-club-welcomes-zopa-person-to-person-lending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/lending-club-welcomes-zopa-person-to-person-lending/</link>
	<description>The Official Lending Club blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="Blog 8.1" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/lending-club-welcomes-zopa-person-to-person-lending/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/welcome-zopa/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>I just got turned down for a loan at Zopa and I have no clue as to
why as of yet. I thought Zopa was a P2P model, but it looks like a
bank just reviewed my application and turned it down in less than a
couple of hours. This just leaves me to think - what the heck is
Zopa? Why didn&#039;t I just apply at the bank? I figured at least
getting people to &quot;bid&quot; on the loan would help to reduce the risk
to the bank, thus increasing the chances for it being funded. Dang
- yet another possible good idea neutralized by some weird business
concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got turned down for a loan at Zopa and I have no clue as to<br />
why as of yet. I thought Zopa was a P2P model, but it looks like a<br />
bank just reviewed my application and turned it down in less than a<br />
couple of hours. This just leaves me to think - what the heck is<br />
Zopa? Why didn't I just apply at the bank? I figured at least<br />
getting people to "bid" on the loan would help to reduce the risk<br />
to the bank, thus increasing the chances for it being funded. Dang<br />
- yet another possible good idea neutralized by some weird business<br />
concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usnelcid</title>
		<link>http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/lending-club-welcomes-zopa-person-to-person-lending/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>usnelcid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lendingclub.com/2007/12/09/welcome-zopa/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Kudo&#039;s for your warm welcome of Zopa. I checked out Zopa&#039;s site
last Wednesday because I was interested in diversifying my P2P
lending business portfolio and I was disappointed by the business
model they chose. It&#039;s quite different from their UK operations,
which I would have invested in if I were a UK resident since they
are similar to lendingclubs. Their US structure has too many things
working against it for me to seriously consider investing in it:
Compared to lending club borrowers pay higher interest, lenders get
significantly lower returns, and the &quot;help&quot; system is a conflict of
interest when a person is aggressively pursuing higher returns. As
a philanthropic venture it is an excellent way to feel good about
how you save your money, but the most I would ever invest in it is
my short term savings reserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudo's for your warm welcome of Zopa. I checked out Zopa's site<br />
last Wednesday because I was interested in diversifying my P2P<br />
lending business portfolio and I was disappointed by the business<br />
model they chose. It's quite different from their UK operations,<br />
which I would have invested in if I were a UK resident since they<br />
are similar to lendingclubs. Their US structure has too many things<br />
working against it for me to seriously consider investing in it:<br />
Compared to lending club borrowers pay higher interest, lenders get<br />
significantly lower returns, and the "help" system is a conflict of<br />
interest when a person is aggressively pursuing higher returns. As<br />
a philanthropic venture it is an excellent way to feel good about<br />
how you save your money, but the most I would ever invest in it is<br />
my short term savings reserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

